Ladonia State Bank v. McDonald
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, O. J.
(after stating the facts as above). The action of the trial court in sustaining appellees’ contention that it was without jurisdiction to hear and determine appellant’s suit was predicated on the requirement in article 4656, R. S. 1925, that:
“Writs of injunction granted to stay proceedings in a suit, or execution on a judgment, shall be returnable to and tried in the court where such suit is pending, or such judgment was rendered.”
Appellant insists, and 'we agree, that the statute was not applicable to the case made by its facts, and, therefore, that the action of said court was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hart v. MoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Van Ratcliff v. CallTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Carey v. LooneyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Leachman v. Capps and CantyTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Gohlman, Lester Co. v. Ada T. WhittleTexas Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holmes v. Terminal RR Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Thomason v. SherrillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932