Bernstein v. Brenner
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PARKER, District Judge.
The defendant in this case has moved to suppress a deposition, pursuant to Rules 30(e) and 32(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Defendant is the widow of a deceased artist and the plaintiff is his father.1 The deceased died intestate and the plaintiff relinquished his right to receive the share of his son’s paintings in return for a consideration paid to him by defendant, the administratrix of the estate. In accepting the consideration, plaintiff relied on certain representations of the defendant and her agents as to the value and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Voorheis v. Hawthorne-Michaels Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Drummond v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Will Docter Meat Co. v. Hotel KingswayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1950
- Inland Bonding Co. v. Mainland Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
- Smith v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Russ Ballard & Family Achievement Institute v. Lava Hot Springs Resort, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Related Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1982
- Klorer v. Block, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
- Crabtree v. MeasdayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
- Beckwith v. Bethlehem SteelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.