Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Scalzitti

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1990No. 64A03-8911-CV-517PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATON, Judge.

Karol Nelson appeals from the denial of her petition for child support modification and attorney fees, presenting the following issues for review:

I. Did the trial court erroneously fail to find changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms of the existing support order unreasonable?

II. Did the trial court erroneously fail to calculate and enter a child support order in accordance with the Indiana Child Support Guidelines?

*167III. Did the trial court err in failing to award attorney fees to Nelson?

We affirm.

On May 25, 1989, Karol Nelson, the custodial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dye v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Carter v. HicksIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Dye v. YoungIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Nelson v. ScalzittiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API