Kopecky v. Hasek Bros.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Linn District Court__Milo P. Smith, Judge. Action at law to recover damages. The material facts are stated in the opinion. There was a directed verdict and judgment for defendants, and the plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
piixsicians and resuiV ofatee™al ln£erenceUStifiable The defendants are engaged as partners in the practice of dentistCedar Rapids. During the year 1912, they undertook to treat and fill one of the plaintiff’s teeth, and continued such treatment from time to time for a period of about two months. In her petition in this action, plaintiff alleges that said treatment was administered and the work of filling the tooth was performed in a careless and negligent manner; that, in drilling and preparing the tooth to receive the-filling, the operator negligently punctured or broke through the wall of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Evans v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Reynolds v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
3Cited by10 opinions
- Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Koslowski v. SanchezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Stickleman v. SynhorstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.