Legal Opinion

M. & J. Tracy, Inc. v. Williams Bros.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 4, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

By stipulation all of the above eases were tried together, the first eight on libels alleging that damages were caused to libelants’ vessels by. the steamship Southway, in which actions the Port Reading Railroad Company has been impleaded as respondent, on the petition of Williams Bros. Cardiff, Limited, claimant, under the fifty-sixth rule in admiralty, and the last two being on cross-libels filed by the owner of said steamship, and one opinion will suffice.

By permission of the proper harbor authorities the Port Reading Railroad Company, some years before the day in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. The HavenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  2. Potter Transp. Co. v. FranksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  3. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc. v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1922
  4. Lykiardoupulo v. Staples Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. CohoctonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Villain & Fassio E Compagnia Internazionale Di Genova Societa Riunite Di Navigazione v. the Tank Steamer E. W. SinclairDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. The Hammond v. Central R. Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
  3. The Libby MaineDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924
  4. Red Star Towing & Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API