Legal Opinion · Dissent

Corley v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 21, 2017No. 1160132Published

1Dissent

PARKER, Justice (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. The sole issue on appeal is whether Jason S. Corley's action against Valerie A. Richardson, in her capacity as president of Bishop State Community College ("BSCC"), is barred by the doctrine of State immunity. See § 14, Ala. Const. 1901. I dissent because I believe that Corley pleaded facts that, if true, would allow him to pursue his action against Richardson. Corley should be given the opportunity to engage in discovery and to prove the facts pleaded in his complaint.

A brief recitation of the facts is necessary to make clear my position…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ButtsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Nance by and Through Nance v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Phillips v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API