Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Amato

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1941No. Appeals, 273-276PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendants Amato and Frattone were employees of Giovanni Porreca a wholesale flour dealer, the former as a salesman, the latter as salesman and bookkeeper. These defendants, in separate indictments, were charged with larceny of certain monies received by them on sales of their employer’s flour, under the Penal Code, Act of June 24, 1939, P. L. 872, §815, 18 PS 4815. They were also charged with fraudulent conversion. Both were convicted as indicted but were sentenced for the offense of larceny by employee only. They were not sentenced in Nos. 274 and 275 October Term,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. TurzaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Commonwealth v. PugliseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RhoadsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. KrzesniakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Commonwealth v. ButtsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. ChuingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  5. Commonwealth v. DennisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API