Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Srovnal v. Linton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1976No. 75-904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

I

It should be borne in mind that in this case we are concerned with a zoning use exception and not with a zoning use classification change. The former is purely administrative in character in connection with executing provisions of -a municipal zoning code. The latter is legislative in character;

The appellants argue, in their brief, that: Resolution No.' 1975-78 makes substantive changes in the zoning code which are not provided for in the administrative'procedure of the code and is, therefore, legislative in nature, consti*211luting an amendment of. the-zoning code, and subjeet'to the referendum…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Myers v. SchieringOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Schwartz v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Talbut v. City of PerrysburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API