State ex rel. Srovnal v. Linton
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
I
It should be borne in mind that in this case we are concerned with a zoning use exception and not with a zoning use classification change. The former is purely administrative in character in connection with executing provisions of -a municipal zoning code. The latter is legislative in character;
The appellants argue, in their brief, that: Resolution No.' 1975-78 makes substantive changes in the zoning code which are not provided for in the administrative'procedure of the code and is, therefore, legislative in nature, consti*211luting an amendment of. the-zoning code, and subjeet'to the referendum…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Donnelly v. City of Fairview ParkOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Myers v. SchieringOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Schwartz v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
3Cited by12 opinions
- Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. City of Cuyahoga FallsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Talbut v. City of PerrysburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Community Concerned Citizens, Inc. v. Union Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.