State v. Tindell
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIVAN, Chief Justice.
The trial judge correctly treated a motion to dismiss as a motion to suppress evidence and sustained said motion. The State appeals. We reverse the trial court.
The record shows the following: After stopping a pickup truck displaying a paper registration in the back window and an expired license plate, a police officer learned that the vehicle had just been purchased from the appellee’s business, Tin-dell’s Auto Sales. The certificate of title was not notarized nor did it bear the name of a purchaser. The officer went to Tin-dell’s Auto Sales, where he advised the salesman…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. BlakeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. PeaseIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Pueblo v. Ferreira MoralesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.