Legal Opinion

People v. Abney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed, in accordance with the following Memorandum: The People concede that the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish that defendant, as a nonowner operator of the vehicle, knew that there was not proper insurance on the car. Since it was incumbent upon the prosecution, as part of its case, to prove knowledge of facts on the part of the accused sufficient to " 'constitute the act or omission’ ” (People v Shapiro, 4 NY2d 597, 600), defendant’s conviction, under count seven of the indictment, for operation of an uninsured…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ShapiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. People v. GraderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. MagistroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. BakosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Frankel v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. ScherbnerNew York Justice Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API