Legal Opinion

Bilque v. Merry Bros. Brick & Tile Co.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided July 23, 1932No. 152Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, District Judge.

Complainants seek injunction against respondent from manufacturing and selling a brick tile (hereinafter for convenience called the Merry unit), for the reason that it “infringed on said patent by making and selling a brick tile embodying a patented feature, to-wit, the parallel webs of the brick tile *262covered by Patent No. 1,385,299.” By amendment it was alleged that said Merry unit “infringed on said patent by making and selling the brick tile embodying the patented features set out in claim 1 of the Letters Patent No. 1,385,299, to-wit:

“ ‘A hollow twin block…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Knapp v. MorssSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Shepard v. CarriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API