Legal Opinion

Quita, Inc. v. Haney

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided June 6, 1991No. 11-90-238-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARNOT, Justice.

Quita, Inc. filed suit against G. Lee Haney for damages. When the case was called for trial, Quita did not appear, and the trial court dismissed its case for want of prosecution. Quita appeals the trial court’s refusal to reinstate its case. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded.

This suit was filed on May 12, 1988. Depositions were taken, hearings were held on discovery matters, and the case was set for trial on September 18, 1989, and again on December 4, 1989. Both settings were continued on the motion of Haney. On March 22, 1990, Quita substituted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mandujano v. Oliva, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  2. S.B. & T. Gem Imports, Inc. v. Creswell, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. Yarbrough, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1995
  2. Smith v. Babcock & Wilcox Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Alexis Rivera v. Todd Thurkettle D/B/A Lone Star Brick & Stone, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2024
  4. James Smith and Wife, Shirley Anne Smith, and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Babcock & Wilcox Construction Company, Inc. and the City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
  5. Paul Carson v. Tabitha Webster, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API