Spaziani v. Bancroft

I respectfully dissent because I think Spaziani’s four-count complaint should survive appellees’ motion for summary judgment. The final judgment was premised on the ground that Spaziani was entitled to no relief on any of the four counts he pled1 because he could prove only an oral three-year contract and it was barred by the statute of frauds.2

*745In count I of his complaint, Spaziani alleged Croft Metals, Inc. breached its three-year employment contract with him. Joseph Bancroft is the majority shareholder and primary decision maker. According to Spaziani, Bancroft promised him a compensation…