Legal Opinion
City Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Shreveport Brick Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 30, 1931No. 30245PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
The receiver of the Shreveport Brick Company, Inc., in his first quarterly account recognized the City Savings Bank & Trust Company as a privileged creditor for $68,415.21, secured by pledge of a mortgage note of $100,-000 bearing on certain property of the brick company in the city of Shreveport. The brick company and one Morris Anisman, holding a note of the brick company for $17,460.-20, opposed the account. Both opponents attacked the pledge of the $100,000 mortgage note on the grounds: First, that the execution of the note was authorized solely for the purpose of effecting a loan for the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- National Bank of Xenia v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Garmany v. LawtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Berlin v. CusachsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Ph&338nix Land Co. v. ExallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Gueydan v. T. P. Ranch Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oliver v. Home Service Ice Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Russ v. United Farm Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. WelshSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. United Traction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Slagle v. PeytonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.