Legal Opinion

Paul v. Roberts

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the Superior Court of Detroit. (Chipman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, C. J.

Prior to July 2d, 1878, the defendant was a married woman keeping house with her husband and children. At that time he died. Retween January 1876 and April 26, 1877, a considerable account was made for family groceries. The items were charged on an ordinary pass book which had endorsed upon it “Mr. Roberts.” This suit was brought against Mrs. Roberts to recover the unpaid balance of the account, and the jury found against her. The only dispute was whether the debt was against her or against her husband.

*612The evidence for the plaintiff consisted in this pass book and his testimony tending to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carstens v. HanselmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. City of Detroit v. EiseleMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. City of Detroit v. EiseleMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Pritchard v. BiggerMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Scates v. Canvas Decoy Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API