Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Entrikin

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 19, 1984No. 55,714PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Abbott, J.:

This is an appeal in a declaratory judgment action filed by The Continental Insurance Company (Continental) to determine its obligation under an automobile liability insurance policy, if any, to its insured, Michael B. Entrikin. The trial court held that when the underlying accident occurred the automobile being driven by Entrikin was covered as a replacement vehicle for the one described in the automobile liability insurance policy issued by Continental to Entrikin.

Continental appeals, raising two issues. It contends material issues of fact remain in dispute thus summary judgment…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  2. McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Mitcham v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  4. Farmers State Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Yates CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  5. Maryland Indemnity & Fire Insurance Exchange v. SteersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ponds Ex Rel. Poole v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  2. Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API