Continental Insurance v. Entrikin
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Abbott, J.:
This is an appeal in a declaratory judgment action filed by The Continental Insurance Company (Continental) to determine its obligation under an automobile liability insurance policy, if any, to its insured, Michael B. Entrikin. The trial court held that when the underlying accident occurred the automobile being driven by Entrikin was covered as a replacement vehicle for the one described in the automobile liability insurance policy issued by Continental to Entrikin.
Continental appeals, raising two issues. It contends material issues of fact remain in dispute thus summary judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
- McAlister v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Mitcham v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Farmers State Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Yates CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
- Maryland Indemnity & Fire Insurance Exchange v. SteersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ponds Ex Rel. Poole v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Capozzi v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993