Legal Opinion

Morrison v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 12, 1902No. 2411PublishedCited by 3 opinions

No statement required.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of selling liquor to a minor, and fined $50.

By motion in arrest of judgment, appellant sought to attack the substitution of the complaint and information, both of which had been lost. The attack upon the complaint was based upon the fact that the substituted complaint purported to be made by Hart Craddock, whereas the lost complaint was made by C. A. Duff. The information was attacked because it was based upon a complaint signed by Hart Craddock, whereas there was no such complaint ever made. The statement that these matters were unknown is…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API