Legal Opinion

Kowalski v. Tesmer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 13, 2004No. 03-407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

543 U.S. 125 (2004)

KOWALSKI, JUDGE, 26TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT OF MICHIGAN, ET AL.

v.

TESMER ET AL.

No. 03-407.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 4, 2004.

Decided December 13, 2004.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.

REHNQUIST, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which O'CONNOR, SCALIA, KENNEDY, THOMAS, and BREYER, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 134. GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which STEVENS and SOUTER, JJ., joined, post, p. 136.

Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General of Michigan, argued the cause…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Rehnquist; Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. (HC) Jackson v. NeuschmidDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  2. (HC) Pink v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API