Legal Opinion

Pringle v. Valdez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 26, 2007No. 06SC92Published

1Opinion of the Court

171 P.3d 624 (2007)

Debbie Jo PRINGLE, Petitioner

v.

Mark VALDEZ, Respondent.

No. 06SC92.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

November 26, 2007.

Wheeler Trigg Kennedy LLP, John M. Vaught, Terence M. Ridley, Andrew M. Unthank, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Petitioner.

Roberts Levin & Patterson, P.C., Bradley A. Levin, Jeremy A. Sitcoff, Denver, Colorado, Caplis & Deasy, LLC, Daniel J. Caplis, Denver, Colorado Attorneys for Respondent.

Sears & Swanson, P.C., Victoria C. Swanson, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Colorado Trial Lawyers Association.

Snell & Willmer L.L.P., Lee A.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson/Couvillon v. Nebraska Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Giampapa v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  5. Brooke v. Restaurant Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API