Legal Opinion

Aerated Products Co. of Buffalo, Inc. v. Godfrey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, P. J.

The defendant, State Commissioner of Public Health, appeals from a declaratory judgment which determined that “ Instant Whip,” manufactured by plaintiff under a patented process, is not a milk product as defined in regulation 1 of chapter 3 of the Sanitary Code, established and made pursuant to section 2-b of the Public Health Law, but is a manufactured food product, not subject to the Sanitary Code, and should be classified as “ frozen desserts mix ” (Agrie, and Mkts. Law, § 71-a), and that the attempt by the defendant to require plaintiff to comply with the Sanitary Code is unreasonable and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New York Foreign Trade Zone Operators, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Richfield Oil Corp. v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. WhitmanOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. De Veau v. BraistedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Niagara Falls Power Co. v. HalpinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. SlocumNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Sta-Whip Sales Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API