Legal Opinion
Finklea v. Heim
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 18, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for personal injuries resulting from a motor vehicle accident. However, prior to the time that an MRI showed the existence of a mid-line disc herniation, plaintiff signed a full release in consideration for the sum of $1,200, relinquishing “all claims, actions, damages * * * on account of or in any way growing out of, any and all known and unknown personal injuries and damages resulting from an automobile *1057accident which occurred on or about [May 31, 1997].” Supreme Court properly granted…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- DeQuatro v. Zhen Yu LiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Galatioto v. HanesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gibli v. KadoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Paige v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Brock v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Bronson v. HanselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Dempski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.