Legal Opinion
Bridgeview Development Corp. v. Hooda Realty Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 29, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In an action for, inter alla, specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated January 15, 1988, as, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
While we agree with the trial court that the "Memorandum of Understanding” at issue here was merely a memorialization of preliminary negotiations and was not itself a contract, it should be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Willmott v. GiarraputoNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Jaffer v. MilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Francesconi v. NutterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Tetz v. DexterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bhutta Realty Corp. v. Paul SangettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Dates v. Key Bank National Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- 288 St. Nick, L. L. C. v. 288 Kiseki Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Atai v. Dogwood Realty of N.Y., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Steinbuch v. KapellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004