Dike v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Bamsey county, where the action was tried by Brill, J.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The only question in this case is whether Laws 1887, c. 158, is in violation of the constitutional amendment of 1881, (Laws 1881, c. 3, § 1,) wbich prohibits the legislature from enacting any special or private laws, among other things, “for granting to any individual, association, or corporation, except municipal, any special or exclusive privilege, immunity, or franchise whatever.” The contention on behalf of the state is that the act in question grants to plaintiff a “special privilege,” because it gives him the right to appeal to the district court from the decision of the commission…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc. v. SeegerSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Hammer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Koike v. Board of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
- State ex rel. Mathews v. HoudersheldtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Foreman v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.