Legal Opinion

Caldwell Sugars, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 3, 1944No. 45677PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

The plaintiff sues to recover $22,392.44 paid as unjust enrichment taxes under Title III of the Revenue Act of 1936 (49 Stat. 1734-39) for its fiscal year ending February 28, 1936. The history of its claim is as follows. The Agricultural Adjustment Act as amended (48 Stat. 670), imposed a processing tax on the first domestic processing after June 7, 1934, of sugar cane into direct-consumption sugar. The plaintiff was engaged in that kind of processing, and for the first processing season, that is, until April 30, 1935, it paid the processing tax. After the seasonal shut-down it resumed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Samara v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Standard Lime and Cement Company (Formerly Known as the Standard Lime and Stone Company) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  2. Gerrard v. CampbellDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1949
  3. Cherokee Textile Mills v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  4. Eastman Kodak Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  5. Franklin Peanut Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API