Legal Opinion
Scott v. Lumpkin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 9, 1980No. 58835PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff appellees listed their home for sale with appellant’s real estate firm, and also engaged him to find a new residence for them. Two exclusive listings have expired, the Lumpkins instructed Scott to remove the sign, but relented and gave him a few more days. The evidence supportive of the verdict establishes that within the week Scott had produced a home they wanted to buy (and later a buyer for the home they wanted to sell) but the hitch was the down payment. At that time, according to the Lumpkins’ testimony, Scott had suggested that Lumpkin take out a loan in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Ringer v. LockhartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Williams v. Moore-Gaunt Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Beach v. FlemingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Black & White Construction Co. v. Bolden Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Garcia v. Unique Realty & Property Management Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Glenn v. FOURTEEN WEST REALTY, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Mitchell v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Zappa v. BasdenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.