Legal Opinion

Vittorio v. St. Regis Paper Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1924Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Davis, J., who dissents and votes for reversal on the grounds stated in his memorandum on the former appeal (See 202 App. Div. 775), and the additional ground that it now appears that the plaintiff has failed to establish that the defendant instigated the prosecution. (Hyatt v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 162 App. Div. 367; Homeyer v. Yaverbaum, 197 id. 184; Macauley v. Starr, Inc., 194 id. 643; affd., 233 N. Y. 601; Tyson v. Bauland Co., 68 App. Div. 310; Gearity v. Strasbourger, 133 id. 701; Greene v. Fankhauser, 137 id. 124.)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tyson v. Joseph H. Bauland Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. MacAuley v. . Theodore B. Starr, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Vitterio v. St. Regis Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Hyatt v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API