Legal Opinion

Bodo v. Cioppa

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 18, 2023No. 1:17-cv-09254Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BERNADETTE BODO AND ) OVIDIU ANDREICA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 17-cv-09254 v. ) ) Judge Martha M. Pacold ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al.,1 ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Bernadette Bodo and Ovidiu Andreica challenge the denial of Bodo’s Form I-130 application under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), the Fifth Amendment, and the Mandamus Act. [10].2 Defendants are a group of government officials responsible for the administrative adjudication of the application. Before the court are the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API