Bodo v. Cioppa
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BERNADETTE BODO AND ) OVIDIU ANDREICA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) No. 17-cv-09254 v. ) ) Judge Martha M. Pacold ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al.,1 ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Bernadette Bodo and Ovidiu Andreica challenge the denial of Bodo’s Form I-130 application under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), the Fifth Amendment, and the Mandamus Act. [10].2 Defendants are a group of government officials responsible for the administrative adjudication of the application. Before the court are the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.