Eason v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
2Per curiam
The verdict of the jury was as follows: “We, the jury find the defendant, A. D. Eason, the father of the bastard child, Clara Mae; H. O. Dean, foreman.”
For the first time during the entire progress of the proceedings, the appellant, now on application for rehearing, claims that such error prevailed in the form of the verdict aforesaid as would preclude the rendition of a proper judgment thereon. And this is the sole point now urged.
The merits of the question aside, there is no basis for a review of the point, there being no assignment of record asserting error in this regard. The…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
- Hamilton v. Cranford Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Holloway v. CalvinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Harris v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
- W. T. Smith Lumber Co. v. McLainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.