Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 23, 2009No. A09A0609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

The trial court denied Lamario Danielle Jackson’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his person after his vehicle was stopped. Jackson was then convicted at a bench trial of possession of less than one ounce of marijuana. On appeal, Jackson contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the arresting officer lacked a reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity to justify the stop of his vehicle. As the trial court concluded otherwise based on findings of fact that are supported by the evidence, we disagree with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Silva v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Veal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  2. Polk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Christopher M. Thornton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API