Floyd County v. Griffin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Judge.
1. The petition containing allegations of damage due to flooding of the plaintiff’s property resulting from the construction of a highway by the defendant was not subject to the general demurrer interposed. Dougherty County v. Long, 93 Ga. App. 212, 213 (91 SE2d 198); Tift County v. Smith, 107 Ga. App. 140 (3) (129 SE2d 172), reversed on other grounds, Tift County v. Smith, 219 Ga. 68 (131 SE2d 527).
2. While other allegations of the petition, including those alleging damage resulting from a cul-de-sac, might have been subject to special demurrer, the special demurrers filed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tift County v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Dougherty County v. LongCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Tift County v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
3Cited by7 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Dougherty County v. SnellingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Department of Transportation v. DurpoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Horton v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Cheek v. Floyd CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.