Patteson v. Myers
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentHurst, J.
I am of the opinion that this resale tax deed is void on its face because it omits two recitals, namely, (a) the xfiace of the original sale, and (b) that the land was legally liable for taxation, and that instead of following, we should overrule, Reeves v. Caldwell (1937) 379 Okla. 501, 66 P.2d 75. Prior to that decision, this court had been consistent in its decisions as to the necessary recitals for the various forms of tax deeds.
It must be borne in mind that a resale tax deed is based upon two sales: (a) The original sale, at which the county is an in voluntary purchaser and secures only…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conners v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Beggs v. PaineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Wade v. Crouch and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Lowenstein v. SextonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Cochran v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.