Legal Opinion

Agnew v. City of Corunna

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1885PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued defendant for damage to a ‘ horse and buggy, relying on the statute which'provides a recovery of damages for injuries arising by reason of streets being out of repair. Judgment went for defendant.

The accident occurred while plaintiff’s son was driving through the streets of Corunna, during the day-time, and is claimed to have been the result of his horse becoming frightened by seeing a large stone standing in the highway, between the track usually traveled in the middle of it and the gutter at one side. He did not pass by it on this occasion, and it is insisted that while…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Macomber v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Cook v. City of CharlestownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Gilbert v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Bemis v. Inhabitants of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Cook v. Inhabitants of MontagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McEvoy v. City of Sault Ste. MarieMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. McArthur v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Beall v. Township of AthensMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. City of Anderson v. EastIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ross v. Township of IoniaMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API