Legal Opinion

Sanger v. Stimpson

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1811PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit on a promissory note, dated the 12th day of July, 1808, made by one William Prentiss, by which he promised the defendant to pay him or his order one hundred and fifty dollars, isl foreign money, in ninety days, for value received, and an endorsement by the defendant to the plaintiff. In the declaration there were two counts. In one, the plaintiff averred a demand on Prentiss, and notice to the defendant, the endorser.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit on a promissory note, dated the 12th day of July, 1808, made by one William Prentiss, by which he promised the defendant to pay him or his order one hundred and fifty dollars, isl foreign money, in ninety days, for value received, and an endorsement by the defendant to the plaintiff. In the declaration there were two counts. In one, the plaintiff averred a demand on Prentiss, and notice to the defendant, the endorser. In the second count, the plaintiff averred due diligence to demand payment of Prentiss, and notice to the endorser. At the trial on the general issue, before the Chief…

1Opinion of the Court

But the Court

held the declaration good, and that the objection to the notice to the defendant was not well taken; and they ordered judgment to be entered on the verdict.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. M'Cormick v. TrotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1823
  2. President of the Northampton Bank v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Bank of Luverne v. SharpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Gushee v. EddyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API