Legal Opinion

Matter of Will of Lamparter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1998No. 354A97PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

This appeal presents the single issue of whether beneficiaries under a holographic will may testify in a caveat proceeding as to oral communications between themselves and the decedent with regard to the testator’s intent to make a new will or about specific bequests to be contained in a new will. The Court of Appeals majority concluded that Rule 601(c) of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence, the Dead Man’s Statute, does not disqualify interested beneficiaries from testifying with regard to oral communications between themselves and the decedent. The Court of Appeals thus…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Godwin v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Matter of Will of HesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. In Re WestfeldtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. In Re the Will of BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Carswell v. Greene Ex Rel. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Forbis v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Breedlove Ex Rel. Howard v. AEROTRIMCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State of North Carolina Durham County Martin Totorgul v. AbayhanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. In Re Will of BaitschoraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API