Legal Opinion

Scott v. Fink

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1881PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error to Ingham. Appeal from probate. Proponent brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Sarah Scott propounded for probate an instrument purporting to be the last will of her father John Fink. Opposition was made by John Fink, the half brother, and by Mary Fink, decedent’s widow, and the step-mother of said John and Sarah. The Court of Probate admitted the instrument as decedent’s last will, and the contestants appealed from the decision. An issue seems to have been made up in the Circuit Court, but the record fails to explain its shape. Enough appears to indicate that proponent affirmed the instrument in question as the last will of the deceased John Fink, and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James v. MarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1821
  2. BOUDINOT v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1796

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Williams v. MilesNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Pickens v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Cheever v. NorthMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Dudley v. GatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Dougherty v. HolscheiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API