Carlson v. Roth
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The appellant recovered judgment below and the appellees’ subsequent motion for a new trial was granted. The case is awaiting a second trial below while the appellant seeks a review of the court’s action in granting a new trial.
The granting of a new trial puts a case back where it was before trial and supersedes any judgment that may have been rendered therein. The situation is the same as though no trial had ever been had. Compton v. Benham (1909), 44 Ind. App. 51, 61, 85 N. E. 365; Colchen v. Ninde (1889), 120 Ind. 88, 22 N. E. 94; Jackson Hill, etc., Co. v. Merchants Heat, etc., Co.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Colchen v. NindeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Compton v. BenhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Enmeier v. BlaizeIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
- Gray v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- Jackson Hill Coal & Coke Co. v. Merchants Heat & Light Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Topper v. DunnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Newsom v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962