Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mathews v. State Election Board

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 11, 1978No. 52590Published

1Concurrence

BRIGHTMIRE, Special Justice

(specially concurring):

In my opinion the term “qualified elector” was used in Art. VII, Sec. 8(g) as a means of incorporating by reference Art. Ill, Sec. 1 citizenship, age, and residency provisions as qualifying requirements for district judges. One of these residency prerequisites is that the candidate shall have resided in this state for “at least six months next preceding the election . ”■—a requirement which I think was not destroyed by Dunn’s1 conclusion that unreasonable durational residency requirements for voting privileges infringed upon a citizen’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Daxon v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API