Legal Opinion

Sneve v. Lunder

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 4, 1907No. Nos. 14,896—(98)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in the district court for Otter Tail county to recover $3,000 for breach of promise of marriage. The case was tried before Baxter,. J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict-in favor of the plaintiff for $1,500. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, if plaintiff consent to take judgment for $1,000, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial after a verdict for the plaintiff. The action was for damages for the breach of an alleged marriage contract, and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of $1,500. The trial court, deeming this excessive, reduced the amount to $1,000, which the plaintiff accepted.

There are numerous assignments of error, but it is only necessary to consider one. The complaint alleged a simple contract to marry and its breach by the defendant.. The answer denied that any contract was made. No requests were made for instructions…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chellis v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Johnson v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Clement v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Tamke v. VangsnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Morgan v. MuenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Burch v. BernardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  4. Kirschbaum v. LowreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Hively v. GolnickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API