Legal Opinion

West v. Klotz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1881Published

Error to the District Court of Erie County.

1Opinion of the CourtOkey, C. J.

Tbe Nes Silicon Steel Company erected a rolling mill at Sandusky, and subsequently failed, and- tbe question presented is as to tbe priority among its creditors.

*421On December 10, 1875, Klotz & Kromer filed in tbe court of common pleas of Erie county, a jietition to enforce a mechanic’s lien on property in that county belonging to the Steel Company. Among the defendants in the action, beside the Steel Company, was William T. W est (plaintiff in error), who claimed as successor of Lester S. Hubbard, under a mortgage on the same property executed by the Steel Company to Hubbard as trustee for its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Greenpoint Sugar Co. v. . WhitinNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Central Gold Mining Co. v. PlattNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1870

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API