Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Haymes

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1920No. Nos. 7466/7851Published

1Opinion of the CourtLane, J.

This suit was brought by George Raun, one of the appellees herein, against the other appellee, T. L. Haymes, and appellant, W. N. Dixon, to recover the stun of 1$342.75, alleged to be balance due him for threshing 2,285 sacks of rice, the property of defendants, at 60 cents per sack. He alleged that Haymes and Dixon had jointly contracted with him for such threshing, and that he had performed his part of said contract; that the sum due therefor was $1,371; that Haymes and Dixon had paid him $1,028.-25, and there was still due and unpaid of such sum a balance of $342.75, for which he sues.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Sweetwater v. Biard Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Nations v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Harlan v. Acme Sanitary Flooring Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API