Legal Opinion · Dissent

Logue v. Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1997No. Appeal No. 2Published

1Dissent

Lawton and Doerr, JJ.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. In our view, the application and renewal application of defendant Dr. Robert F. Barnes (Dr. Barnes) for cholecystectomy laparoscopic privileges at defendant Lake Shore Hospital (Hospital) are protected from disclosure to plaintiffs in this medical malpractice action by Education Law § 6527 (3). The purpose of that provision “is to encourage peer review of physicians at medical review committee meetings by guaranteeing confidentiality to participants, in order to accomplish improvement in the quality of medical care” (Parker v St.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parker v. St. Clare's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Swartzenberg v. TrivediAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Koithan v. ZornekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API