Legal Opinion

State v. Sexsmith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1936No. 26055. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

The defendant was informed against by an information, the charging portion of which reads as follows:

“That the said defendant, J. H. Sexsmith, in the state of Washington, county of Spokane, on or about the 18th day of November, 1933, then and there being, and then and there having in his possession, custody and control as pledgee, trustee and bailee of Frank Miller personal property, to-wit: Five hundred shares of Jack Waite mining stock, the property of and belonging to Frank Miller, and of the value of one hundred twenty-five (125) dollars, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ZerilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Wooten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. State v. StylesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Maurice E. Travis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Maurice E. Travis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API