Legal Opinion

Gratz v. Gratz

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 25, 1939PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This case was before this Court on an appeal from an order denying motions to strike and to dismiss the bill of complaint. The pleading was held sufficient by decision of this court, Gratz v. Gratz, 127 Fla. 605, 173 South. Rep. 442.

From the very lucid presentation of the facts and law of the case by counsel for the two litigants, we feel that the allegations of the bill, particularly with reference to the charge of extreme cruelty, have been substantiated by the evidence.

Cruelty need not be actual bodily harm, but it is enough to sustain the charge where it is established that there was a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herron v. PassailaigueSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Horn v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Wood v. LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1887
  5. Donald v. DonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Frank v. FrankSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Windham v. WindhamSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Baron v. BaronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Cruickshank v. CruickshankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API