Legal Opinion

Haqq v. Synergy Gas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 16, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Synergy Gas and Arthur Sullivan appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barron, J.), dated September 5, 1997, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*443A 1996 amendment to CPLR 3212 (a), effective January 1, 1997, requires the making of a motion for summary judgment within 120 days after the filing of the note of issue…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phoenix Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Wade v. Byung Yang KimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Krug v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Leis v. FinkelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Argent Mortgage Co. v. VlahosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Harrison v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Monroe v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API