Legal Opinion
State v. Thompson
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1994No. S-94-049PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.
The defendant, Frances L. Thompson, appeals from the judgment of the district court which overruled her motion for a new trial. Actually, Thompson filed one motion on May 24, 1993, claiming newly discovered evidence, and a supplement to that motion on November 23, claiming prosecutorial misconduct in withholding potentially exculpatory materials. The trial court ordered that “the Motion for New Trial based on newly discovered evidence is overruled and the Motion for New Trial based upon prosecutorial misconduct is overruled.” Thompson’s sole assignment of error is as follows:
The Trial Court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Richard Wayne Snell v. A.L. Lockhart, Richard Wayne Snell v. A.L. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JacobNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Avina-MurilloNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. KulaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JonesNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. SAPANAJINNebraska Court of Appeals · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.