Carter, Webster & Co. v. United States
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland
On Application for Review of a Decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers. The decision in question affirmed the assessment of duty by the collector of customs at the port of Baltimore on merchandise imported by Carter, Webster & Co. Note G. A. 4,721, T. D. 22,357, and G. A. 5,235, T. D. 24,073.
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, District Judge.
The importations were cotton half hose, in open work or lace éffects, haying embroidered' upon them •dots or other designs in silk thread. They were assessed for, duty at the rate of 60 per cent, ad valorem, under paragraph 339 of -.the tariff act o'f July 24,- 1897, cl- 11, § 1,; Schedule-J, 30 Stat. 181 [U- S. Comp. St.. 1901,, p. 1662], 60 per cent, ad valorem being á greater duty- than the compound rate imposed by paragraph 318 of- the same - act (chapter 11,. § :1, Schedule. I, 30, Stat.. 179 [U., S. *979Comp. St. 1901, p. I860]), upon cotton half hose without…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Robertson v. GlendenningSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Arthur v. HomerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. AltmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
- In re ScheferCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lichtenstein Millinery Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907