Legal Opinion

Hanaford v. Hawkins

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 21, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Exceptions to the Court of Common Pleas for Kent county.

1Opinion of the CourtStiness, J.

The garnishees made an affidavit setting forth that at the time of the service of the' writ upon them, for the purpose of attaching the personal estate of the defendant in their hands, they had such personal estate to the amount of two hundred and thirty-three dollars, the net proceeds of a judgment collected by them in favor of said defendant; provided no. legal effect should be given to the fact that they had received a letter from John A. Hawkins, prior to this garnishment, stating that he had purchased said judgment; but if the.fact stated in said letter was true and the right to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jemko, Inc. v. LiaghatNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Jetco, Inc. v. Bank of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  3. Westminster Bank v. AthertonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API