Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Kidd

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to restrain the enforcement of a judgment and have same declared paid and canceled.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

This action is brought to restrain the enforcement of a judgment and have the same declared paid and canceled.

The judgment in question was obtained upon a note made by one Graydon W. Graydon to the order of William 0. Kidd and indorsed by the plaintiff Franklin and delivered to the payee. Kidd. Kidd subse*400quently indorsed the note and discounted it at the Bank of Hamilton. To be more correct, the note upon which the judgment was obtained was a renewal of a prior note made in the same way. When the note became due it was not paid and the Bank of Hamilton sued and obtained judgment upon it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hobart v. . HobartNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Church v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Blanchard v. . BlanchardNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Miller v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Connelly v. . O'ConnorNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Franklin v. KiddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API