Legal Opinion

Harrison v. . Harrison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1890PublishedCited by 17 opinions

■ This was a case heard upon motion, before Graves, J., at July Term, 1889, of Granville Superior Court. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, J.:

The co-executor, George Harrison, was removed without notice, and L. A. Paschal appointed administrator, with the will annexed. This administrator, in October, 1870, filed a petition against Nancy E. Harrison, the widow of the testator, and the other defendants, his devisees, to sell certain real estate for assets. No service of any kind was made upon any of the defendants except George Harrison, as to whom there was service by publication. No guardian ad litem was appointed for the infant defendants, nor were they in any way represented.

On the 3d of December, 1870, an order was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perry v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Larkins v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Clark v. . HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Card v. Finch.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Fowler v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Harrison v. . HargroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API