Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Weberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 3, 1925No. 24,481PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the first cause of action set forth in their complaint.

Plaintiffs are husband and wife. They executed a mortgage to defendant for $4,000 on a quarter section of land in Chippewa county. They claim that the mortgage is null and void, for the reason that plaintiff P. Anton Peterson holds the land under and through the will of his father, which will expressly provided that the land should not be subject to alienation during the lifetime of his mother for whose benefit a charge was imposed thereon and who is still living. They ask…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jones v. ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Adam v. McClintockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Carson v. CochranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Concord Union Mut. F. Insurance v. WoodburySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
  5. Mason v. FichnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Watts v. WrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API